Navigating the Long Tail of Opportunity in Business

The long tail of opportunityMy experience as an entrepreneur, and our work with clients in dozens of industries, has helped me realize that opportunity is everywhere for unique and innovative companies that bring real value to customers.

But opportunity can be overwhelming if you don’t adapt to changing markets and growing demand, focus on your core customers and strengths, and build a scalable infrastructure.

Growth for growth’s sake, without a profitable business model or strong exit strategy (for those who are more concerned with pre-profit valuation), results in little more than an entrepreneurial ego boost.

The Long Tail of Opportunity

The Long Tail, as defined by Chris Anderson, applies to the collective strength of the niche markets/products in the demand curve tail, and their ability to out produce a relatively small number of top selling products at the head of the curve.

While many businesses such as Amazon, Netflix, eBay, Google and Apple have built empires on the Long Tail, it is extremely difficult for service-intensive businesses to extend too far down the tail due primarily to the limitations of human resources.

So, as I grappled with our agency's growth during the last 12 months, I started seeing a long tail of opportunity emerging, similar to what can be found in many businesses.

Unlike in an online, product-based model in which inventory and niches can be infinite, for many businesses still bound by human resources and shelf space the questions become, how do we assess growth opportunities — not just services and markets, but anything that can impact growth — and where do we chop the tail off?

Sample Model

For the sample chart below, I’m considering an “Opportunity” (X-axis) anything that has potential to increase revenue. For “Growth,” (Y-axis) I’ve shown hypothetical percentage returns that could result from an increased focus on an opportunity over the next 24 months.

Note, in some cases the opportunities with the greatest growth potential won’t actually be profitable decisions in the short term. Also, not all opportunities are created equal, and some require greater risk if you want to lead and position yourself where the market is going, instead of following the herd.

The long tail of opportunity

So, in this theoretical example, in which the vertical markets and emerging services collectively represent significant growth opportunities, a strategic decision is made to cut off the tail at “Pricing Strategy” (represented by the red dotted line).

This means we would not invest energy or resources in pursuing those opportunities in the tail to the right of the red line.

Knowing When to Cut Off the Tail

Here are a few lessons I've learned about how to assess the long tail of opportunity.

  1. Know your strengths and limitations as an organization. If the instrastructure isn't in place, don't push the growth beyond your ability to service it.
  2. Concentrate on retaining and growing your core customers. They are your most profitable and important relationships.
  3. For service-based businesses, your people are your greatest asset. Have an employee recruitment and retention plan from day one.
  4. Recognize a quality new business lead, and stop wasting time on prospective clients that won't value your people and your services.
  5. Trust your gut instinct when it comes to determining direction. Research and analyze your options, but only to refute what you already know to be the best choice.
  6. Take risks, but understand and accept the ramifications of your actions when you fail.
  7. Remember that the goal is to produce profits. Make decisions based on profit, not revenue, potential.
  8. Don't be afraid to completely evolve what you have spent years building. Listen to the markets, adapt to demand and move where others aren't willing or able to go.

Your Long Tail

So what do you think? Does your business have a long tail of opportunity? How do you navigate it and decide which opportunities to pursue?

 

Paul Roetzer is founder and president of PR 20/20, a Cleveland-based inbound marketing agency and PR firm. He can be found on Twitter @PaulRoetzer

 Subscribe to receive the PR 20/20 blog by email or RSS feed.

Reader Comments

  1. Nicki

    Thanks, Paul, for an interesting look at how to adapt a service business to the Long Tail model. Having a marketing firm, I had tried to figure out how to create an online version of our expertise. I ended up realizing it was an all new business model that would likely usurp resources from the core business that would be detrimental - exactly your #1 lesson! http://www.lemmontree.com/home.html
  2. Paul Roetzer

    Nicki, thanks for the comment. Automating and standardizing marketing services in an online model is an excellent idea that is being done well in some niche service areas, such as logo design. There are even some firms trying to do it now in emerging areas such as content marketing.

    I'm glad to see these firms moving the industry forward, but there definitely are some hard lessons to be learned along the way.
  3. Tac Anderson

    Paul, excellent post. I love how you broke out the long tail by business models. You've just visualized what I've been explaining to startups for years. Thanks.
  4. Paul Roetzer

    Thanks, Tac. I think too many businesses just go after growth without prioritizing opportunities and considering their long-term impact on strategic direction and profitability.

    Lots of leads can be wonderful, but they can also distract us from our core mission and strengths if we're not careful.
  5. Peter Caputa

    Very insightful post, Paul. I know you made a big effort to write this in 3rd person, instead of first, but I can't help but draw the connections to many marketing firms like yours.

    I find it interesting that you put "Vertical market" below the red line. I could point to a bunch of "marketing/website dev" businesses who decided to focus on a vertical. Then, they got really big. The nice thing about verticalizing, is that marketing firms can develop a lot of vertical expertise, processes, packages, etc that can be used over and over again. A lot of efficiency and effectiveness gains can be made that make it almost impossible for a non-vertical player to compete.

    Also, I've seen a bunch of firms that have built a distributed contractor-based labor force for behind the scenes work. This seems to give them the ability to expand and contract the amount of work they take on w/out many cash flow consequences.
  6. Paul Roetzer

    Pete,

    Thanks for the comments. You make some excellent points. In this hypothetical situation, there are a number of reasons why the firm has chosen not to develop services and pricing tailored to the vertical markets, despite the tremendous market potential that exists.

    Most likely it is due to a focus on first establishing the scalable infrastructure and strategic partnerships needed to do it in an effective and profitable way.

Leave a Comment

Connect with PR 20/20